7227 stories
·
34 followers

Why is France accusing Azerbaijan of stirring tensions in New Caledonia?

1 Share

Azerbaijan vehemently rejects the accusation it bears responsibility for the riots that have led to the deaths of five people and rattled the Paris government.

But it is just the latest in a litany of tensions between Paris and Baku and not the first time France has accused Azerbaijan of being behind an alleged disinformation campaign.

The riots in New Caledonia, a French territory lying between Australia and Fiji, were sparked by moves to agree a new voting law that supporters of independence from France say discriminates against the indigenous Kanak population.

Advertisement

Paris points to the sudden emergence of Azerbaijani flags alongside Kanak symbols in the protests, while a group linked to the Baku authorities is openly backing separatists while condemning Paris.

"This isn't a fantasy. It's a reality," interior minister Gérald Darmanin told television channel France 2 when asked if Azerbaijan, China and Russia were interfering in New Caledonia.

"I regret that some of the Caledonian pro-independence leaders have made a deal with Azerbaijan. It's indisputable," he alleged.

But he added: "Even if there are attempts at interference... France is sovereign on its own territory, and so much the better".

"We completely reject the baseless accusations," Azerbaijan's foreign ministry spokesman Ayhan Hajizadeh said.

"We refute any connection between the leaders of the struggle for freedom in Caledonia and Azerbaijan."

In images widely shared on social media, a reportage broadcast Wednesday on the French channel TF1 showed some pro-independence supporters wearing T-shirts adorned with the Azerbaijani flag.

Tensions between Paris and Baku have grown in the wake of the 2020 war and 2023 lightning offensive that Azerbaijan waged to regain control of its breakaway Nagorno-Karabakh region from ethnic Armenian separatists.

France is a traditional ally of Christian Armenia, Azerbaijan's neighbour and historic rival, and is also home to a large Armenian diaspora.

Darmanin said Azerbaijan - led since 2003 by President Ilham Aliyev, who succeeded his father Heydar - was a "dictatorship".

Advertisement

On Wednesday, the Paris government also banned social network TikTok from operating in New Caledonia.

Tiktok, whose parent company is Chinese, has been widely used by protesters. Critics fear it is being employed to spread disinformation coming from foreign countries.

Azerbaijan invited separatists from the French territories of Martinique, French Guiana, New Caledonia and French Polynesia to Baku for a conference in July 2023.

The meeting saw the creation of the "Baku Initiative Group", whose stated aim is to support "French liberation and anti-colonialist movements".

The group published a statement this week condemning the French parliament's proposed change to New Caledonia's constitution, which would allow outsiders who moved to the territory at least 10 years ago the right to vote in its elections.

Advertisement

Pro-independence forces say that would dilute the vote of Kanaks, who make up about 40 percent of the population.

"We stand in solidarity with our Kanak friends and support their fair struggle," the Baku Initiative Group said.

Raphael Glucksmann, the lawmaker heading the list for the French Socialists in June's European Parliament elections, told Public Senat television that Azerbaijan had made "attempts to interfere... for months".

He said the underlying problem behind the unrest was a domestic dispute over election reform, not agitation fomented by "foreign actors".

But he accused Azerbaijan of "seizing on internal problems."

A French government source, who asked not to be named, said pro-Azerbaijani social media accounts had on Wednesday posted an edited montage purporting to show two white police officers with rifles aimed at dead Kanaks.

"It's a pretty massive campaign, with around 4,000 posts generated by (these) accounts," the source told AFP.

"They are reusing techniques already used during a previous smear campaign called Olympia."

In November, France had already accused actors linked to Azerbaijan of carrying out a disinformation campaign aimed at damaging its reputation over its ability to host the Olympic Games in Paris. Baku also rejected these accusations.

Adblock test (Why?)



Read the whole story
cherjr
26 minutes ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

Ryanair says it will close its Bordeaux base

1 Share

"Due to increased costs we don't have any financial alternative but to close our Bordeaux base in November," the company's commercial director Jason McGuinness said in a statement released in French.

The airline has been operating around 40 flights to and from Bordeaux.

In the statement it said the three planes and 90 staff currently based at the Bordeaux airport would be transferred to other, less costly, bases within its network.

READ ALSO Are France's loss-making regional airports under threat?

Advertisement

Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary said in March that Bordeaux airport was seeking to double its fees and warned he would shut the base rather than pay that amount.

Bordeaux-Merignac airport said it had "put limits on the financial demands" of Ryanair and would pursue its strategic objective of diversifying the airlines which use airport.

"We don't wish to see a company which has been installed in Bordeaux for 14 years leave," the airport told AFP.

"If it would like to work again in Bordeaux, it will be welcome," it added.

Bordeaux-Merignac in 2023 was the eighth busiest French airport with 6.6 million passengers.

However, this figure is just 85.5 percent of pre-Covid 2019 levels whereas the average for French airports was 92.7 percent.

Bordeaux's airport was particularly hit by the end of its flights to Paris, victim of a French government ban on any domestic flights that can be replaced by train in less than three hours.

Adblock test (Why?)



Read the whole story
cherjr
38 minutes ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

История дня по итогам голосования за 17 мая 2024

1 Share
Во всей красе моя изысканная вежливость проявилась еще в детстве.
Как-то взрослые оставили по какой-то причине нас с братом одних, дожидаться сантехника и поручили дать сантехнику бутылку водки после работ.
Приходит сантехник, и он...- женщина! Мы хоть и были детьми, а сообразили, что вот так вот сунуть даме бутылку водки не комильфо.
Поэтому мы достали бабушкину шкатулку со всякой всячиной для шитья и взяли оттуда красивые атласные ленты, повязали на бутылку роскошный бант и вручили со всем возможным почтением.
Сантехник была в восхищении!
Read the whole story
cherjr
19 hours ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

The curtain may be coming down on Donald Trump's show trial

2 Shares

You’d think a guy who lies as much as Michael Cohen would be better at it.

On Thursday, under relentless cross-examination from defense lawyer Todd Blanche, Cohen drove the effort to make Donald Trump a felon for the “crime” of misclassifying accounting records over a cliff.

To recap: in October 2016, Cohen paid the adult-film actress Stormy Daniels $130,000 to buy her silence over her alleged affair with Trump. In 2017, Trump and his company paid Cohen $420,000, partly to reimburse Cohen for that payment. Trump is now on trial in Manhattan for 34 felony charges of “falsifying business records” because - in his own ledgers - the payments to Cohen were classified as legal services.

I have written before about the case’s many problems. Local Democratic prosecutors are openly trying to punish Trump for winning the 2016 election. They have twisted the law they claim Trump broke past recognition. (I even suggested last week Trump should consider refusing to participate in the case, since it is so nakedly political.)

(Seriously, what just happened? Find out, for 20 cents a day.)

Subscribe now

But.

The (bizarre) theory underlying the indictment is that Trump committed felonies because he made the payments as part of a conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, even though he made them in 2017.

Put aside the fact that local prosecutors do not have clear authority to charge Trump for trying to win a federal election by making a (legal) hush money payment - and in fact have not charged him with doing so. Put aside that Trump might have had other motivations to pay to keep Daniels quiet, such as to avoid damage to his marriage.

For the underlying theory of the case to make even a bit of sense, Trump must have told Cohen to make the payments on his behalf - and to have done so before Election Day. After all, even if Trump agreed to reimburse Cohen secretly after the election was over, his decision to repay Cohen couldn’t have affected its results.

But the only people who know if - and even more crucially, when - Trump told Cohen to make the payments are… Trump and Cohen.

No one disputes this fact. No written written records prove Trump authorized the payments. And even though Cohen secretly recorded Trump (and many other people), he does not have a recording of Trump telling him to make them.

Again, even assuming everything else the prosecution says is true - and that the legal theory underlying the indictment holds up - the jury must find Trump innocent unless it agrees he told Cohen to pay Daniels before Election Day.

For three weeks, prosecutors have skillfully hidden this fact by presenting a case filled with irrelevancies, including Daniels’ testimony about her encounter with Trump in 2006. In fact, whether Daniels and Trump had sex makes no difference. (I don’t think Trump should have pushed his lawyers to argue the point. He clearly did, and in trying to deny it, he risked undercutting the significance of the far more crucial Cohen testimony. But he’s obviously pretty embarrassed about it.)

(Just wait until you hear about her personality!)

But this week, prosecutors ran out of diversions.

They had to take the gamble of putting Cohen on the stand. Yes, Cohen is a convicted felon and a serial liar, but unless he links Trump to the reimbursements before the election, they do not have a case.

So up Cohen went.

His direct testimony was fine. But on cross-examination, Todd Blanche - Trump’s lead defense lawyer - destroyed him.

Over and over, Blanche showed Cohen to be a liar. The New York Times - yes, the Times - wrote:

"Todd Blanche is demonstrating that Cohen told lies, big and small, over a long period... Jurors might also need to consider a more philosophical question: can a liar sometimes tell the truth?"

“Sometimes tell the truth?” Wow, the standard for a criminal conviction sure has changed! I thought it was “beyond a reasonable doubt,” silly me.

But the most devastating moment in the cross-examination came relatively early, just before the lunch recess.

Cohen had claimed that on Oct. 24, 2016, about two weeks before the election, he called Trump’s bodyguard, Keith Schiller, to talk to Trump and get Trump’s approval for the payments to Daniels.

Blanche forced Cohen to admit that he had actually called Schiller because Cohen was upset he had been receiving prank phone calls and wanted Schiller’s advice in dealing with them. Cohen then claimed he thought he had also discussed the payment with Trump on the call.

The problem for Cohen, and the prosecution, is that the entire call lasted only 96 seconds.

As Anderson Cooper - yes, Anderson Cooper - said on CNN, in recounting the moment:

It was incredible...lawyers want to build a box around the witness & slam it shut--that's what Todd Blanche did to Cohen...it was an extraordinary cross...Cohen was cornered in...a lie.

And not just on any testimony, but on the issue at the heart of the case.

The case is basically over now.

Blanche will have a couple hours more to cross-examine Cohen Monday morning. Then the prosecution will have to choose whether to try to repair Cohen’s blasted credibility with a short period of additional “redirect” testimony - at the risk of emphasizing how bad Blanche made Cohen look.

The defense indicated it will have few, if any, witnesses, so the jury could hear closing arguments as early as Tuesday.

(Don’t make me sic Michael Cohen on you!)

Subscribe now

Over 86 percent of Manhattan voters supported Joe Biden in 2020, so Trump will have few if any fans on this jury. An outright acquittal seems very unlikely.

But will all 12 jurors really convict Trump on the basis of Cohen’s words, after what Blanche just did? If even one refuses, the prosecution will have failed.

Make no mistake, a hung jury would be a huge win for Trump. The case could not possibly be retried until after Election Day, and anything short of a guilty verdict would give him enormous ammunition to attack the prosecution as a politically motivated effort to distract him from his campaign.

And that the blowback would be exactly what the prosecutors who brought this joke of an indictment deserve.

Read the whole story
cherjr
21 hours ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
bogorad
1 day ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Анекдот дня по итогам голосования за 16 мая 2024

1 Share
Объявление: "Ищу высокого мужчину, чтобы помог снять тюль для стирки. Разовые отношения не интересуют - потом тюль нужно будет повесить обратно".
Read the whole story
cherjr
22 hours ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

🖼 После вчерашнего выпуска (часть его снята на территории Гёттингенского универ...

1 Share

После вчерашнего выпуска (часть его снята на территории Гёттингенского университета) написал Андрей Коняев – издатель @nplusone, ведущий Kuji Podcast и один из главных амбассадоров науки в России.

Цитирую полностью:

«Хотел про Гёттинген историю рассказать короткую. Это в прошлом был главный математический институт в мире. То есть когда Соня говорит, что там Гаусс – это полдела. Там были все, не было в мире математического центра мощнее.

В начале 20-го века там был Гильберт, а на семинар к нему приезжал Эйнштейн. Докладывал про свою относительность, ошибки у него там находили. Туда же, в Гёттинген, Гильберт устраивал на работу свою ученицу, великую Эмми Нетер. Когда ему сказали, что там, мол, у нас женщинам нельзя, он заметил, что тут не баня, так что нет проблем.

В 30-е годы в этом университете началась чистка. Причем начали ее студенты, одним из которых был Освальд Тейхмюллер – великий математик, реально, член НСДАП с 1931 года. Изгнали всех, даже Гильберту пришлось доказывать, что он не еврей. Когда уже в начале 40-х тогдашний министр науки Германии спросил Гильберта, мол, как поживает математика, избавившаяся от еврейского влияния, тот в ответ спросил: «Какая математика?»

Так вот прикол в том, что математика была уничтожена подчистую. Так больше никогда Гёттинген и не стал математическим институтом.

Если что, Освальд Тейхмюллер в 43-м написал заявление на имя Гитлера, чтобы его отправили на фронт. Его отправили – и лежит он где-то, ориентировочно, под Смоленском».

Read the whole story
cherjr
22 hours ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories