7894 stories
·
34 followers

10 ways to save American healthcare!

2 Shares

First things first: One week to Father’s Day. I’ll have more to say about THE FATHERHOOD MANIFESTO soon. Your emails have been very supportive, and the great reviews keep pouring in on Amazon.

So don’t wait. Get your copy now, in time for Father’s Day!

American medicine is a $5 trillion mess that eats anyone who tries to fix it (the knives are now out for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.).

But our healthcare doesn’t have to be this bad. I woke up thinking of 10 ways to improve it. (Yes, this is actually what I woke up this Sunday morning thinking about. I know, I need more hobbies.)

The first two are probably the most popular politically — and the least likely ever to go anywhere. But even the simplest of these would face huge political and economic obstacles. Still, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try for them.

(Unreported Truths doesn’t take weekends off. Please support it!)

Subscribe now

So, without further ado, here are 10 changes I’d make to the healthcare leviathan if I were in charge:

1: Break up local health care monopolies and oligopolies, particularly the “nonprofit” regional and academic hospital systems that have grown spiderwebs around nearly every metro area. Set strict limits on local concentration, recognizing that nearly all health care is delivered locally.

2: Set windfall salary taxes on executives at those systems. These hospitals pay no taxes. They are supposed to serve the public interest, not their executives. If they want to receive the benefits of ordinary charities, they should run like charities.

3: Move to the Danish vaccine schedule for children. Most importantly, end the recommendation for universal Hepatitis B shots at birth. Vaccinations are not public health theater and shouldn’t be treated that way. If a child isn’t at reasonable risk for contracting an illness she shouldn’t have to be vaccinated against it because other children are.

4: Prevent pharmaceutical companies from profiting from any medicine sold under the Food and Drug Administration’s “accelerated approval” program — that is, without proof of clinical benefit. In general, I think accelerated approval is a mistake. “Surrogate endpoints” like changes in the amount of protein a cell produces may or may not actually help a patient feel better or live longer, the changes that actually matter.

But if we are going to allow accelerated approvals, we have to force drug companies to follow through by producing real data proving those benefits. And pharma companies have shown they will drag their feet as long as they are making money from a drug sold under the accelerated program.

5: Begin a long-term program of funding placebo-controlled clinical trials to determine if common minor surgeries are helpful compared to rehabilitation, rest, and waiting. It’s more than surgery for meniscal tears — many surgeries have much weaker clinical evidence than people realize.

6: End all gain-of-function research designed to increase viral or bacteria transmissibility or dangerousness. Propose an international agreement making all such research a crime against humanity. Covid proved the risks of such research.

Beyond that, Covid revealed the fatal flaws in the theory (propounded by virologists, of course) that virologists need to run such research to determine the dangers of newly emerging viruses. After all, they didn’t predict Covid, or any of the evolutionary pathways it took. We cannot predict how pathogens will evolve in the wild, only respond to them when they do.

Setting a bright line on this issue is particularly important at a time when artificial intelligence tools may give private and non-state researchers a greater ability to pursue gain-of-function research.

If such research must be conducted at all, it should be run in a handful of government-run labs worldwide — no more than one in any country — that are internationally supervised.

Like these ideas? Consider a one-time donation to Unreported Truths! Don’t like them? Donate anyway!

7: End insurance parity between mental health and physical health conditions (except for psychiatric drug treatments that have randomized controlled trial evidence supporting them). I know this one will be very controversial with many of you.

But we have next to no evidence that mental health care works, and the nebulousness of these conditions allows the creation of expensive honeypots like autism behavioral therapy.

8: At a minimum, sharply cut back on drug addiction rehab coverage, which is incredibly expensive, fails to reduce addiction or relapse when it is tested, and actually encourages unscrupulous operators and companies to recycle addicts through programs to survive. Insurance companies should be required to provide one 30- to 60-day rehab every five years; after that the addict or his family is responsible for covering the cost.

9: Allow insurance companies to create and sell inexpensive, high-deductible health insurance products — true catastrophic insurance. This would return health insurance to its roots and make it more like other insurance products; your home insurance covers serious damage to your house, not fixing a faucet.

10: End medical aid in dying programs. When a patient has days or weeks left with a terminal illness, the difference between pain control and hastening life’s end can be impossible to distinguish. (Even then, physicians should be cautious.) Outside of that boundary, doctors should not be in the euthanasia business. The experience of Canada, Belgium, and other countries shows these programs inevitably metastasize.

If people are too afraid to kill themselves to do so without a doctor’s help to make the process effortless and painless, they probably shouldn’t be killing themselves. And doctors — who are in the business of healing —- should not be helping them.

(Whew! That was 10! Reward yourself for getting to the end with a subscription.)

Subscribe now

So. At least for today, Those are my Top 10 American Healthcare Fixes (TM).

Looking forward to hearing what you think of them — and your own suggestions.

Read the whole story
cherjr
3 hours ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
bogorad
5 hours ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete

Paris Metro to begin using bank-card entry payments

1 Comment

The public transport authority for the Greater Paris region has announced that Metro users will soon be able to 'tap in' to the network using their bank cards, rather than having to buy a ticket or pass.

The so-called ‘touch-in, touch-out’ system was first introduced in London in 2012 and allows visitors to the UK capital to simply tap their bank card at either end of their journey to pay their fare, eliminating the need for tickets. Since then it has been rolled out in French cities including Brest, Lyon and Marseille.

The French capital has been slower off the mark, but on Friday the regional public transport network Ile de France Mobilities announced that it will begin to roll out this system on the Metro, starting with the most popular tourist lines.

Paris buses have been equipped with direct card-payment terminals since 2025, but entry to the Metro still requires a ticket, pass or app. There was no announcement about a similar system for the city's tram network, or the RER suburban trains.

READ ALSO: Navigo Easy or phone tickets? The best Paris Metro passes for tourists

IDFM president Valérie Pecresse did not give a precise timetable for the rollout, but said that it will begin "soon" and will be aimed at tourists, beginning on the lines most popular with visitors.

Advertisement

She did not give details, but it seems that the tap-in bank card payments will be charged at the regular price of €2.50, meaning that locals will still most likely opt for Navigo passes, which offer a discounted per-journey rate.

READ ALSO: What's the best option when buying tickets for the Paris Metro?

Paris public transport system has been gradually phasing out paper tickets, and since the start of the year passengers can only buy tickets via a pass or on the Ile de France Mobilites or Bonjour RATP apps.

Visitors have complained that the system is too complicated and time-consuming for tourists who simply want to purchase a single journey.

Consumer groups too have long been in favour of the ‘touch-in’ system, which is seen as one of the more simple solutions for public transport payments. The president of the Plus de Trains association said existing ‘ticketless’ systems, such as the IDFM app are “not user friendly”.

The rollout of bank card payments has been made more straightforward by the ending of the zone system, meaning that people will not have to 'tap out' at the end of the journey in order to calculate the price of their ticket. Instead, all journeys within the greater Paris region (with the exception of airport tickets) are priced at a flat fee of €2.50.

Having a weekly, monthly, annual or pay-as-you go Navigo card gives subscribers a discounted price of €2.04 per journey.

Adblock test (Why?)



Read the whole story
cherjr
8 hours ago
reply
да неужели
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

Анекдот дня по итогам голосования за 11 июня 2026

1 Share
Премьер-министр Польши Дональд Туск заявил, что договор между Великобританией и Польшей нужен, потому что «история учит создавать надежные союзы».

Вы еще Францию туда позовите.
Read the whole story
cherjr
2 days ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

Анекдот дня по итогам голосования за 11 июня 2026

1 Share
Скажите, а вот воду горячую отключили тоже для нашей безопасности?
Read the whole story
cherjr
2 days ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

Госдума в 12 раз повысила пошлину за получение российского гражданства и отказ от него. Теперь это будет стоить 50 тысяч рублей

1 Comment

Госдума во втором и третьем чтениях приняла законопроект, кратно увеличивающий пошлины на миграционные услуги.

Пошлина за оформление российского гражданства и выход из него выросла в 12 раз — с 4200 до 50 тысяч рублей.

Пошлина за оформление вида на жительство в РФ увеличилась в пять раз (с шести до 30 тысяч рублей), за выдачу разрешения на временное проживание — в восемь раз (с 1900 до 15 тысяч).

Также увеличилась пошлина за привлечение иностранцев к работе — до 15 тысяч рублей за человека.

Инициатором повышения пошлин был Минфин РФ. Спикер Госдумы Вячеслав Володин объяснял, что таким образом власти хотят «влиять на уровень приезжающих». «Это должен быть человек состоявшийся, добившийся многого», — говорил он о том, какими в Госдуме видят желательных мигрантов.

Читайте также



Read the whole story
cherjr
3 days ago
reply
и выходить тоже должен состоявшийся, добившийся многого
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

История дня по итогам голосования за 09 июня 2026

1 Share
Вчера у нас в мастерской. Один роняет какую-то важную штуковину на пол. Матерясь, наклоняется, и тут комбинезон на жопе трещит по шву. Второй меланхолично: "Руки режутся..."
Read the whole story
cherjr
3 days ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories