7880 stories
·
34 followers

Иностранцам запретили подаваться на грин-карту на территории США

1 Share

Иностранные граждане, желающие получить подтверждение вида на жительство и право на работу в США (грин-карту), могут подавать соответствующие заявления только за пределами Соединенных Штатов. Об этом говорится в новом меморандуме Службы гражданства и иммиграции США (USCIS).

«Отныне иностранец, временно находящийся в США и желающий получить грин-карту, должен вернуться в свою страну для подачи заявления», — заявил пресс-секретарь USCIS Зак Калер.

Он отметил, что исключения из этого правила возможны только при «чрезвычайных обстоятельствах», поэтому студенты, временные работники и туристы, приезжающие в США с конкретной целью и на определенный срок, не должны рассматривать свой визит как первый шаг в процессе получения грин-карты.

По словам Калера, подача заявлений из других стран освободит ресурсы USCIS для других задач и «снизит необходимость поиска и депортации тех, кто решит уйти в тень и остаться в США нелегально после отказа в предоставлении вида на жительство».

По данным The Washington Post, американские власти ежегодно выдают более одного миллиона грин-карт, при этом более половины заявителей подают документы на территории США.

В декабре 2025 года США приостановили лотерею грин-карт (DV1), в рамках которой ежегодно разыгрывалось до 55 тысяч виз. Это решение власти связали со стрельбой в Брауновском университете. Как выяснилось, стрелявший въехал в США в 2017 году именно по программе DV1, а затем получил грин-карту.

Какие еще есть ограничения



Read the whole story
cherjr
11 hours ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

Глава ВТБ заявил, что «надо быть довольным» тем, как развивается в России экономика. И рассказал анекдот про 80-летнего мужчину, который жалуется на свист в ушах во время секса

1 Comment

Глава банка ВТБ Андрей Костин, комментируя состояние российской экономики, рассказал анекдот о 80-летнем мужчине, который пришел к врачу с жалобой на шум в ушах. Видео выступления Костина на конференции ассоциации банков России опубликовала радиостанция BFM.

Костин напомнил, что российские банки находятся под западными санкциями с 2014 года, однако, несмотря на это, они успешно развиваются.

«Мы накопили капитал, мы кредитуем экономику, все это работает. И на самом деле, конечно, военные расходы, мы тоже не можем этого не учитывать», — заявил Костин.

По его мнению, с учетом этих факторов «надо быть довольным, как у нас развивается экономика».

«В противном случае, извините, есть такой анекдот. Приходит к врачу пациент и говорит: „Доктор, у меня жалоба. Понимаете, когда я занимаюсь сексом, у меня свист в ушах“. „Вам сколько лет?“ „80“ [отвечает пенсионер]. „А вы что, аплодисментов ожидаете?“» — пошутил Костин.

Читайте также



Read the whole story
cherjr
1 day ago
reply
и смех, и грех
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

История дня по итогам голосования за 19 мая 2026

1 Share
Жена утром перед работой пьет на кухне кофе. Наша кошка тоже проснулась. Ходит по коридору и громко мяукает – завтрак требует. А мы с ребёнком ещё не встали.
Моя вторая половина ей тихим голосом:
- Киса, иди сюда.
Вдруг позади супруги раздаётся зловещий шёпот:
- Это Вы меня зовёте?
Жена сперва облилась горячим кофе, а потом холодным потом. Ведь у неё за спиной только окно тринадцатого этажа… Карлсон, мля, прилетел…
Рассказала, что, когда обсохла и сообразила в чем дело, чуть было об стенку не разбила стоящую на подоконнике колонку с грёбаной Алисой.
Read the whole story
cherjr
1 day ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

Scuffles in France, Italy and beyond as Swatch sale descends into chaos

1 Share

The launch of limited-edition Swatch watches descended into chaos Saturday in several European cities and New York, with French police firing tear gas to restore order at one store near Paris.

Hundreds of people waited through the night -- and in some cases for several days -- hoping to get their hands on the "Royal Pop" timepieces, made in collaboration with luxury watchmaker Audemars Piguet.

In France, lines of hundreds of people formed through the night in several cities, and a police source said officers fired tear gas to control a 300-strong crowd outside a Swatch shop in the Paris region.

A metal shutter and two security gates were damaged in the incident, and police said the stores had underestimated the need for security.

Things also turned ugly in Milan, where a fight broke out in front of a Swatch store at opening time on Saturday, according to footage broadcast by local media.

In the Netherlands, police had to intervene at a mall near The Hague after hundreds of people flocked to the store.

According to the police, "there was a tense atmosphere and some quarrelling". When the store decided not to open after all, people were sent home. Swatch stores in Amsterdam and Utrecht also kept their doors closed.

It is not clear when the stores will reopen. On its website, Westfield Mall of the Netherlands announced "that the introduction of Swatch in collaboration with Audemars Piguet will NOT go ahead. The store will remain closed this weekend".

Advertisement

'Pushing and shoving'

In New York, the opening of the Swatch store in Times Square was met with "pushing and shoving" in the waiting crowd, John McIntosh, who had been in line since Wednesday, told AFP.

"It was like a mosh pit," the 44-year-old said.

"People who got here last night have gone to the front, people who cut this morning, whoever cheats and pushes the hardest hits to front."

Like many others, McIntosh hoped to get his hands on the brightly coloured watch -- sold in store for $400 to $420 to resell it immediately at a huge mark-up.

Another buyer, who gave his name as Mac, said he had managed to get his hands on one after five days of queueing.

"It was pretty hectic... it's nasty, but I was able to get in," he told AFP.

"Retail for them is about $400, I sold one just now for $4000."

Dressed in a grey suit and shades, Benny, 30, decided to pay rather than wait, shelling out $2,400 for one of the watches.

Advertisement

"It's basically $2,000 over retail, but you can't get an AP (Audemars Piguet) for less than $2,000, so I think it was a steal," he said.

"I'd rather pay a premium and come out and get it.”

Swatch was forced to close its stores in London and six other UK cities for "safety considerations" after huge crowds gathered outside.

Contacted by AFP, Swatch declined to comment.

Adblock test (Why?)



Read the whole story
cherjr
5 days ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

Анекдот дня по итогам голосования за 15 мая 2026

1 Share
Позитивное мышление - это когда слышишь сплетни о себе и думаешь - как хорошо, что они не всё знают.
Read the whole story
cherjr
6 days ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
Share this story
Delete

URGENT: A huge win in Berenson v Biden

2 Shares

Goodbye Berenson v (Joe) Biden.

Hello Berenson v (Albert) Bourla.

Today, the Trump Administration and I settled the federal government’s role in Berenson v Biden, my lawsuit against Biden Administration and Pfizer officials for violating my Constitutional rights and forcing Twitter to ban me in summer 2021.

After three hard-fought years, this settlement marks a massive win in my fight to hold the government and Pfizer accountable for their conspiracy to silence me. I could not have done it without your support. (Or Elon Musk’s.)

The agreement includes a six-figure payment and a statement “the Government did in fact violate the First Amendment by exerting substantial coercive pressure on social media companies such as Twitter to suppress disfavored speech like Plaintiff’s.”

James Lawrence, my (very able) lawyer, and I believe this settlement marks the first time any individual American has received a cash payment to resolve a lawsuit over government coercion of social media companies.

More importantly, the government’s admission may prove crucial as my suit moves ahead against its remaining defendants, Pfizer board member Dr. Scott Gottlieb and chairman Dr. Albert Bourla.

I am pleased the Trump administration recognized the Biden White House’s violations of my rights and chose to settle with me despite my recent criticism of Trump. At least in my case, the White House is practicing what it preaches on the First Amendment. A thank-you is in order.

(I will never, never, NEVER stop fighting for the First Amendment and the truth. Join me.)

Subscribe now

The battle is won. But the war is not over.

While the settlement releases the government from the case, it leaves us open to pursue Bourla and Gottlieb for their role in the conspiracy. That conspiracy was not just against me, but against all unvaccinated people who were reading and listening to me as the Biden Administration prepared to force mRNA jabs on healthy adults.

And we are pushing ahead, by asking the federal Second Circuit of Appeals in New York City to find Covid unvaccinated people deserve the same First Amendment protections as a group as many other disfavored groups do.

(Scott Gottlieb does his Scott Gottlieb thing. Yes, he was talking about me. Somehow he forgot to mention in this email that he was getting paid by company that sold about $100 billion in mRNA jabs. Oops!

Todd O’Boyle was Twitter’s top White House lobbyist in 2021. You can smell the swamp fumes from here. Or maybe that’s just Gottlieb’s hair oil.)

The settlement came on the eve of the government’s deadline to file a response to our appeal, after Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke dismissed our lawsuit last fall.

Our complaint contained ample evidence Gottlieb worked with Biden administration officials to force Twitter to ban me in 2021, even as Twitter’s most senior executives questioned if I had done anything to violate the platform’s terms of service. Bourla contacted top officials at the same time, including a White House meeting with Ron Klain, Biden’s chief of staff.

In fact, it was Gottlieb’s direct appeal to Twitter’s White House lobbyist over my famous Aug. 28, 2021 “It doesn’t stop infection” tweet that led directly to my ban.

In general, private companies and individuals cannot directly violate First Amendment rights. But a federal law known as 1985(3) gives plaintiffs the right to sue in federal courts over conspiracies that keep them from “having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States.”

Federal courts have generally construed 1985(3) narrowly. But the conspiracy between Gottlieb, Bourla, and the federal government in 2021 is clearly the type of behavior for which the statute creates liability.

(I hope so much that one day I’ll get to see Pfizer and Scott Gottlieb try to defend banning me over this tweet to a jury. Even a New York jury.)

The question James Lawrence and I will ask the Second Circuit to answer is not whether federal or state governments may require vaccinations. It is whether unvaccinated people have the same rights to speak to each other as people who are vaccinated.1 And the government’s acknowledgement in its settlement that it did in fact violate those First Amendment rights makes my case stronger.

If we win at the Second Circuit, our lawsuit will be alive back in front of Judge Clarke. And we will get the discovery about the communications between the White House and Pfizer in summer 2021 I have been fighting to see for three years.

If we lose at the Second Circuit, we’ll go to the Supreme Court and try there.

Three years in, the fight has only begun.

But today is a good day. A very, very good day. The mainstream media might even have to take notice (though I’m not counting on it).

(And any day is a good day to subscribe! Catch up on the paywalled history of Berenson v BidenBourla)

Subscribe now

Note: that six-figure settlement should cover us through the Second Circuit appeal.

But hopefully we will soon be back before Judge Clarke, fighting Pfizer for depositions, discovery, and the chance to get to a jury.

And over the last four years, beginning with Berenson v Twitter, I’ve realized many of you give because you want to stand with me in this fight.

If that’s how you feel, you can still donate:

Via GiveSendGo

Via GoFundMe

You can also Venmo me at Alex-Berenson-3

Or send a check to James Lawrence at Envisage Law, PO Box 30099
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622

Donations of all sizes welcome — this is about standing together.

1

We have other arguments too, including whether Gottlieb and Bourla interfered with my contract with Twitter, but this one is the most important legally and constitutionally.

Read the whole story
cherjr
10 days ago
reply
48.840867,2.324885
bogorad
11 days ago
reply
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories